I… wow. Yesterday in the UK, the Atheism, Secularism and Humanism Society was going to host a talk titled “Sharia Law and Human Rights.” As the president of their society put it (http://blog NULL.newhumanist NULL.org NULL.uk/2012/01/student-organised-talk-on-sharia-law-at NULL.html): Continue reading “Violence, the Heckler’s Veto of the Coward” »
[Cross-posted to the Freethinkers group (http://groups NULL.google NULL.com/group/freethinkers-club/browse_thread/thread/1b999ed7d221b6d0).]
Courtesy John Loftus (http://freethoughtblogs NULL.com/loftus/2012/01/11/creating-god-in-ones-own-image-god-agrees-with-me/), I just got wind of a veeeery interesting
Psychological studies have found that people are always a tad
egocentric when considering other people’s mindsets. They use their
own beliefs as a starting point, which colours their final
conclusions. [Nicholas] Epley found that the same process happens, and
then some, when people try and divine the mind of God. Their opinions
on God’s attitudes on important social issues closely mirror their own
beliefs. If their own attitudes change, so do their perceptions of
what God thinks. They even use the same parts of their brain when
considering God’s will and their own opinions.
Creating God in one’s own image (http://blogs NULL.discovermagazine NULL.com/notrocketscience/2009/11/30/creating-god-in-ones-own-image/)
I was prepared to dismiss it with “correlation does not equal
causation,” but Epley tried to cover that angle by being careful when
he asked for God’s view and manipulating the beliefs of those taking
the study. I’d love a follow-up study with more volunteers!
Looks like same-sax marriage may be under threat in Canada (http://www NULL.cbc NULL.ca/news/canada/story/2012/01/12/pol-harper-same-sex-marriage NULL.html):
The renewed attention was sparked by the case of an unidentified lesbian couple who married in Canada in 2005 but split up in 2009. […] The couple went to court last June seeking a Canadian divorce, despite the federal Divorce Act’s one-year residency requirement, which they do not meet. […]
But in addition to the residency requirement, a submission from a federal government lawyer in response to the couple’s case cites another reason for refusing to grant the divorce — that they are not legally married.
To be fair, the government proper seems to have been caught unaware by this, and Harper has said he doesn’t want to re-open the debate. Given how much they love back-room (http://rabble NULL.ca/blogs/bloggers/corvin-russell/leaked-memo-harper-government-plans-backdoor-restructuring-first-natio) shenanigains (http://m NULL.theglobeandmail NULL.com/news/national/the-coming-conservative-court/article2022139/?service=mobile), however, I’m going to keep a close eye on this one…
[This is a repost of something I fired off to the Freethinkers mailing list (http://groups NULL.google NULL.com/group/freethinkers-club/browse_thread/thread/1bd004d4c7be5142).]
Changes are afoot in the skeptical/atheist community.
I’m not sure when this process began. Elevatorgate (http://bigthink NULL.com/ideas/39234)?
#mencallmethings (http://tigerbeatdown NULL.com/2011/11/07/why-are-you-in-such-a-bad-mood-mencallmethings-responds/)? Both feel like tipping points with a fair bit of
momentum already behind them. Whatever the case, feminism has become a
big deal within the community.
And it’s about damn time!
Randy, Christine, Haysn, Matthew and Graham profile Calgary psychic/clairvoyant Kim Dennis (aka Clairvoyant Kim). We examine the credulous beliefs she espouses and critique an episode of her now-defunct Public Access television show “Antiques Psychic”. We also take a look at a fundamentalist religious group appealing to the (nonexistent at this time) Office of Religious Freedom to intervene in the William Whatcott case before the supreme court. Should that not work, a day of fasting and prayer surely will! We also find time to discuss the deafening silence from the Vatican over what they will do now that ex-Bishop Raymond Lahey has been sentenced for posession of child pornography right after settling a lawsuit filed by victims of molestation in Maritime Canada. He was released this last week for time served.
that Dominionism is the best way to go. Never heard of it? Read this, and weep:
There are Christians and then there are Dominionist Christians — the ones who think they have a biblical mandate to take dominion over the entire world for Christ. [… Some of them are now] denying that anything called Dominionism even exists; others are changing the definition of Dominionism, claiming that the word dominion is just used figuratively and doesn’t really mean that they want to control all areas of American society and eventually “reclaim” the world for Christ.
Courtesy Ophelia Benson (http://freethoughtblogs NULL.com/butterfliesandwheels/2012/01/justice-delayed/), I’ve got a tale The Fifth Estate (http://www NULL.cbc NULL.ca/fifth/2011-2012/escapefromjustice/) bills as
the next chapter in the story of Jassi Sidhu, the beautiful, young Canadian woman who defied her family when she fell in love with and secretly married an impoverished auto-rickshaw driver in India.
Not long after, she was murdered in a roadside attack, her new husband left for dead by her killers. In the years since, four men were convicted of Jassi’s murder and sent to prison in India.
Evidence gathered by Indian authorities at the time, and presented on the fifth estate, pointed to Jassi’s family allegedly arranging her murder from their home here in Canada.
Now, acting on new information, the fifth estate’s Bob McKeown presents stunning new information about those accused in the killing.
When your belief system encourages you to murder your own child, for the high crime of falling in love with someone, you should ditch it and look for alternatives (http://en NULL.wikipedia NULL.org/wiki/Secular_ethics).
[This is a repost of something I typed up for the Freethinkers mailing list (http://groups NULL.google NULL.com/group/freethinkers-club/browse_thread/thread/b62d5d765bf6416d).]
I’ve heard many people disavow titles like “atheist” or “agnostic” because they don’t like to be labelled, and I’m pretty sure I did it myself for a time.
There’s a power behind names and labels, isn’t there? I have a tough time even writing an ethnic slur, because I know the weight of prejudice behind it. Not only does it claim nasty things, it claims them for a large group of people. Everyone under that label is implied to be identical, exchangeable, and we insist that isn’t true. Am I identical to Karen Armstrong, Eric Steinhart, or Julian Baggini? No, and yet we all call ourselves atheists. Taken to extremes, this sanding down of difference allows us to commit the worst atrocities we’re capable of, and form protected spaces that filter out “the other,” for an arbitrary definition of “other.”
Just read this from a local skeptic, Dean Morrison, and thought it was worthy of sharing:
I know that there’s at least a few of my friends that feel […] my efforts in skepticism are basically my replacement for religion.
Why Skeptics in the Pub is not “Church for Atheists” (http://demonhaunted NULL.blogspot NULL.com/2012/01/why-skeptics-in-pub-is-not-church-for NULL.html?m=1)
400 people converge on Cherryville, North Carolina each year to scare away witches. Justin Griffith has an excellent takedown of this (http://freethoughtblogs NULL.com/rockbeyondbelief/2012/01/02/400-crazy-rednecks-shoot-guns-to-scare-away-the-tree-witches-insane-footage/). In short, it turns out the “ancient” chant that accompanies the ritual actually dates from the 1800’s, rather than the 1300’s as claimed. It’s all pretty silly and a waste of time.
But my beef is not with these rednecks. No, it’s with Justin’s characterization of them as “crazy.” If I applied that label to everyone who forced their rituals on others, who were utterly ignorant of that ritual’s origins yet so enraptured with it that they cannot see how silly the entire thing is, who demand special priviledges for their ritual, I’d have to call at least six billion people “crazy” and the word would stop being useful.